Unlike many other RAW development apps, Luminar only includes the ability to sort your images using Favorite and Rejected flags. When placed in comparison with almost any photo editor except Affinity Photo, Luminar would probably lose, but it gets a free pass here since Affinity Photo doesn’t contain any library management tools at all. This category might seem a bit unfair since it’s a total giveaway for Luminar Neo, even though it only has very basic library management tools in its Catalog module. Affinity Photo for pros, Luminar Neo for beginners. This overall UI design has always felt a bit strange to me, but it’s a minor issue since each of the personas is clear and easy to work with. Each edit you make to an image is treated as a separate filter, and the same filter can be applied multiple times – but each one can also be edited in the Edits section.Īffinity Photo divides its interface into 5 different sections known as personas: Photo for pixel editing, Develop for RAW adjustments, Liquify for a dedicated mesh warping workspace, Tone Mapping for HDR editing, and the Export module for finalizing your work. It is divided into three main sections: Catalog for library management, Presets for purchasing and applying preset adjustments, and the Edit module for making custom edits.įor the most part, this streamlined interface works well, but I find that it can be a bit difficult to follow the chain of edits when working on a complex adjustment. ![]() Luminar Neo is the more user-friendly of the two since it’s designed for a wider audience, including beginners to the world of image editing. Luminar’s interface is much more streamlined, while Affinity Photo will feel instantly familiar to anyone familiar with Adobe products like Photoshop and Lightroom. User InterfaceĪ good user interface can make all the difference between a good editing app and a bad one, but both Luminar Neo and Affinity Photo have well-designed interfaces for their target markets. Luminar Neo and Affinity Photo are both capable image editors, so here are the categories I’ll be comparing between the two apps: user interface, library management tools, RAW development tools, layer-based editing, AI tools, and pricing. Who and What is Affinity Photo Best For?. ![]() In this comparison of Luminar Neo and Affinity Photo, I’ll take a look at the user interfaces and editing abilities of each app, including layer-based and local editing tools, advanced AI features, and how they compare in price and value, as well as their intended audiences. I want to make sure that I have the best tools available for working with my images, so I’ve tested nearly every image editor available today, from industry-standard apps to free and open-source alternatives. Admittedly, that first digital camera was only 3 megapixels, but it started a love of digital imagery that I still have today. My name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve been a digital photographer for over 20 years. ![]() It is only available as a one-time purchase for Windows and macOS, and customers receive free updates until the next major version release. It has excellent RAW development and layer-based editing tools, CMYK color support, and a fully 32-bit color-managed workflow. It is available as a monthly subscription or as a one-time purchase on both Windows and macOS.Īffinity Photo is Serif Labs’ answer to Photoshop for professional image editors who don’t want to be involved in the Adobe ecosystem. It specializes in RAW development using AI and automatic tools for quick edits, so it’s better for creative photo development instead of high-precision editing techniques. Luminar Neo is the latest version in a long line of releases from Skylum, intended for beginners and photo editing enthusiasts. Luminar Neo and Affinity Photo are both excellent image editing apps, but they’re intended for slightly different markets, so the right choice will depend on your exact needs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |